Page 38 - WEF Reoprt 2020
P. 38

Trade, labour and supply                   disruptions, or draconian interventions
            chain disruption                           from panicked policy-makers that imperil
            Climate change will affect trade by distorting   macroeconomic and financial instability.
            prices and disrupting supply chains.  For   Communities will also suffer if jobs are lost
                                            36
            example, with the Artic sea ice melting at   without well-thought-through and equitable
            a record pace, a northern route through    transition plans in place.
            once-impassable waters has “emerged as
            a potential global shipping artery.”  Shifts   Over 40 central banks and supervisors are
                                          37
            in seasonable temperature and rainfall will   already examining how climate risks can be
            place particular stress on economies reliant   integrated into their economic and financial
            on agricultural output,  creating new winners   activities.  The Bank of England has warned
                               38
                                                               41
            and losers in the trade sphere.  The labour   that corporations in incumbent “dirty”
                                       39
            force will experience impacts as well, and   industries can expect to go bankrupt if they
            not only in the structural transition to a low-  fail to understand the risk of their business
            carbon economy: for example, heat stress   models becoming obsolete as investment
            resulting from global warming is projected to   flees to net-zero-emission alternatives.
                                                                                        42
            cause productivity losses equal to 80 million   The Financial Stability Board’s Taskforce
            full-time jobs in 2030. 40                 on Climate-related Financial Disclosures
                                                       announced recommendations in 2017
                                                       that have driven boardroom discussions
            At a crossroads                            regarding financial exposures and transition
                                                       strategies.  Now supported by almost 900
                                                                43
            For the future of climate change mitigation,   companies, assessing financial risk of climate
            2020 is a critical year: it presents the   change is becoming more mainstreamed.
                                                                                           44
            first opportunity for nations to revise    Governments are also moving towards
            their national plans to tackle climate     mandatory disclosure of climate risks by
            change as set out under the 2015 Paris     listed companies.  The investor community
                                                                      45
            Climate Agreement, and to close the gap    is also responding to climate risk, with a
            between what they have pledged and         recent notable development being the launch
            what is needed. An increasing number of    of the UN-convened Net Zero Asset Owners
            governments are announcing long-term       Alliance at the 2019 United Nations Climate
            net-zero emissions goals and showing       Action Summit.
                                                                    46
            more interest in tackling outstanding
            challenges in developing potential low-
            carbon solutions. These include creating
            a low-carbon hydrogen supply chain at
            scale; reducing emissions through carbon     Climate change is striking
            capture, use and storage; managing the
            intermittency of renewables with grid-scale   harder and more rapidly than
            storage solutions; electrifying domestic
            and commercial heating; better recycling     many expected
            of electric car batteries; and mapping out
            the future availability of the raw materials
            needed to support the transition.
                                                       Second, the risk of unilateral geoengineering
            Nonetheless, achieving significant change   gambles will become more likely. Failure
            in the near term will depend on greater    to implement effective regional or global
            commitment from major emitters. Failure to   climate policies increases the risk that
            seize 2020’s opportunity to mitigate climate   countries may decide unilaterally to
            change will have three main consequences.   implement geoengineering projects such
                                                       as ocean fertilization or stratospheric aerosol
            First, transition risks will increase (Box 3.1).   injection. This would risk further disruption
            Further delay in reducing emissions will make   to ecosystems: one recent study, for
            it harder to achieve carbon budget goals:   example, found that stratospheric sulphate
            companies and markets will ultimately be   aerosols could harm agricultural production,
            forced to adjust more rapidly, which could   cancelling out benefits from the reduction
            lead to higher costs, greater economic     in warming. 47


                                                                                           The Global Risks Report 2020  33
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43